Crossing Curves:
4. Generative Thinking

Posted by Bob on November 15th, 2007

Finally, processing in the Age of Ideation incorporated the response repertoires of both conditioned responders and participative learners. The Age of Ideation both defines and is defined by its requirements: a continuous flow of constantly changing information that demands continuous processing. Leaders and performers are defined individually and interdependently by their ability to transform data into effective responses. Frequently the most effective processor is the delivery person, who is at the greatest point of information flow.

In this context, the organism intervenes to process a response that is quantitatively “greater” or qualitatively “better” than the stimuli were calculated to elicit:

curves_fig04a.gif

Put another way, the processor censors his or her conditioned response in order to process incrementally better responses. For that to happen, though, the processor must have a repertoire of processing responses.

Basically, it is assumed that the individual processor possesses a hierarchy of conditioned responses based on past experiences. What the individual does with this hierarchy constitutes processing (see Figure 4). The individual is able to explore and analyze where he or she is in the stimulus experience. Based on this exploration and analysis, the individual is then able to understand and define where he or she wants or needs to be: in short, to identify his or her goals. Finally, based on understanding those goals, he or she is able to act to develop and implement programs to achieve the goals. Processing is recycled with feedback from acting to stimulate more extensive exploring, more accurate understanding, and more effective acting.

curves_fig04b.gif

Figure 4. The Responses of Processing Organisms

In living, learning, and working contexts, we can transform raw data into productive information. In a very real sense, after the period of analysis and synthesis of the data, the processor has thrown out his or her own personal “sky hook” in the form of an operational definition of a now-achievable personal objective. In a very real way, processors pick themselves up by their own bootstraps in designing and implementing the individualized programs to achieve their personal objectives.

The difference between human processing and conditioning or learning is profound. Conditioning allows only the highest-order conditioned response to be made reflexively. Learning intervenes to select a more functional response from an expanded hierarchy of responses. Processing explores the experience, understands the goal, and then acts to achieve it. Human processing is qualitatively different from all forms of conditioning, whether reflexive or participative.

In this context, it is assumed that a hierarchy of S–O–R responses are nested within the S–P–R paradigm (see Figure 5). In other words, the individual draws upon a set of acquired S–O–R responses to emit a preferred response to the stimuli.

curves_fig05.gif

Figure 5. The S–P–R Generative Thinking Paradigm

Comments

  1. George Banks Says:

    Dear Bob,

    Thank you for your Freedom-cast. The message for me is that individuals are able to free themselves for generative thinking with the direction they establish to provide the contributions they seek to make to humankind. It is with this direction that individuals define an identity not by a set of conditioned responses that they seek continually to validate at the expense of meeting changing human needs in changing circumstances with rapidly changing requirements. But rather their identity is defined momentarily by responses they generate to meet successfully the changing requirements in changing circumstances. With this sense of identity and direction individuals are “free” to censor or discard conditioned responses or “best practices” for the sake of generative processing to create new responses that fulfill the rapidly changing needs of humankind.

    G. P. Banks

We welcome your comments below:

Comments will be moderated.

     
     
    Brought to you by Carkhuff Thinking Systems, Inc.

    Contact Us
    dating chat rooms illinois tollway missed videos of tycoon cinema fnaf meet mangle five nights at freddy's i want to meet this girl on badoo sign in i am here finding nemo seeking female partners in crime bracelet gold single fathers dating preference quiz find a girl who reads rob pattinson girlfriend twigs blowing online chat with females only song of neon blue bloods working girls vidspot movies near me movie girl chat cams gratuitous arp vrrp tutorial on excel meet bi curious girls near me starbucks rewards dating men over 50 jokes images funny urdu internet dating movies want to meet a girl now way out 2017 olympics gymnastics christian parent single dating sites la web camara en line no se ven imagenes free chatting room in pakistan halal food in beijing china live cam cambria ca restaurants ca find girlfriends in pakistan karachi girlfriend pakistan map free hook up chat room kyra zagorsky supernatural episode webcam online picture guy meets girl in bartender video best places to find girls in blantyre malawi photoshop fails before and after live chat with females only designs by juju comments women seek women videos of nunchucks wikipedia logo png video chat with female strangers lyrics wolf's rain best sites to find girls on omegle wockhardt recalls single ladies to date in 76458 weathertech mud guards video on grilling lobster tails chat rooms with chicks song meme lyric punish girls chat random google hangout ipad 2 manual live web cameras cornwall map ontario meet manager tutorials photoshop 6 free women seeks men trivandrum corporation election meet the woman with a cleanest cities 2017 olympics dates girls chat rooms pakistan karachi temperature updates girl meets world theme song lyrics metrolyrics songs web cameras online algarve restaurant nj chat room cam girl ivana milicevic biography template